Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 10:11

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
NASA Science Community Budget Meeting POSTPONED - NASA Watch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Yes, That "Materialists" Limb-Lengthening Procedure Is Real - Popsugar
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Heroes of the Storm Live Patch Notes - June 2, 2025 - Blizzard News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why would my husband cheat on me with an ugly fat woman?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
New discovery at the Grand Canyon has rewritten geology textbooks - Earth.com